As a Candidate Research Manager at Stanton House, I have witnessed first hand the challenges and opportunities that come along with an aging workforce. Sadly, although age discrimination is illegal under the Equality Act, I have encountered instances where mature candidates, particularly those in their third quarter of life (ages 50-75), are often overlooked.
On occasion, hiring managers (consciously or unconsciously) use discriminative language to describe their 'ideal candidate'. Rather than focusing on the skills and qualities required to undertake the role, I sometimes hear phrases such as, “I want someone young and dynamic”, “up and coming”, or they even request to see candidates with a specific number of years of experience.
A recent LinkedIn post I read, eloquently echoed what I frequently hear from some of the candidates I speak with, and highlights the struggles and strengths of mature workers:
"I am at the prime of my career and never had myself so together. I've developed resilience, finally know what I need from work to flourish, understand who brings out the best in me regarding leadership, know how I learn, and am committed to continually developing my professional skills. My lifestyle and commitments mean you'll likely retain me if you treat me well, and I've got a hell of a lot more emotional intelligence and life stability than I had at 30. Would you employ me? According to the data, you probably wouldn't."
It is clear that age discrimination, despite being illegal in the UK since 2006 and protected under the Equality Act of 2010, remains a persistent issue. I believe it is time for hiring managers to address this head-on by adopting inclusive practices that recognise the value of older workers. Especially as employers cannot afford to miss out on exceptional talent in a skills-short market!
Globally, the median age of the population is rising. In the UK, workers aged 50+ now represent 32.6% of the workforce, up from 21% in the early 1990s. In the US, the Bureau of Labor Statistics says that 25% of the workforce is now 55 and older. These trends reflect a broader shift: as life expectancy increases, so does the need for sustained employment among older individuals.
Baby Boomers (those born between 1946 and 1964) represent a largely untapped talent pool. Many left the workforce early for a better work-life balance, but with the rise of hybrid working options and the increased cost of living, many are being tempted back to the workplace.
This means employers need to find ways to attract and retain older employees, which might involve redefining traditional career trajectories, offering more part-time positions, and maintaining the flexibility lessons learned from the pandemic.
Age discrimination is not just a moral failing; it's a significant barrier to leveraging a talented and experienced segment of the workforce. According to a study by the Centre for Ageing Better, 36% of people aged 50-60 feel disadvantaged when applying for jobs due to their age. For women, the statistics are even more stark:
A survey of UK recruiters found that 36% had rejected a job applicant based on age. This discrimination not only impacts individuals' careers but also deprives businesses of the wealth of experience and stability that older workers bring.
Our team had a recent example where an older gentleman, who almost didn’t make it past the CV screening stage due to his age, was placed in a senior finance role despite initial reservations from the hiring manager. After the interview, he was the client’s favoured candidate, and I am pleased to say he is now excelling in his new role and bringing a huge amount of value to that organisation.
At a recent LinkedIn event I attended, I was inspired by Avivah Wittenberg-Cox's discussion on the concept of Life’s Four Quarters:
Q1 Grow (0-24 years): A period of learning and exploration, often extending into "emerging adulthood" where individuals explore various activities and roles.
Q2 Achieve (25-49 years): Traditionally viewed as the prime working years, where individuals build careers and families. Wittenberg-Cox suggests that recognizing the length of modern careers can alleviate the pressure to achieve everything in this quarter.
Q3 Become (50-74 years): A new phase of mature, active adulthood. With fewer caregiving responsibilities, individuals can focus on career advancements, personal growth, and new ventures.
Q4 Harvest (75-100 years): A time to reap the benefits of earlier life stages, focusing on legacy, generativity, and continued growth.
She explained that individuals in their third quarter of life (ages 50-75) often have fewer caregiving responsibilities and more time to focus on their careers. So, this period can be their most productive and fulfilling professional phase.
What’s more, there is plenty of evidence that supports the benefits of age diversity in the workplace. A study by the Boston Consulting Group found that diverse teams, including those with age diversity, are more innovative and better at problem-solving. Companies that support multi-generational workforces report higher productivity and lower turnover rates. Despites these facts agism is a topic often ignored in debates around diversity and inclusion.
Further, Lyndsey Simpson, an expert in workforce data, emphasises that businesses leveraging the experience of older employees often see improved mentorship and knowledge transfer, critical for long-term success.
1. Experience & Expertise: Older workers bring a wealth of experience and knowledge to the table. Their extensive career histories mean they have faced a variety of challenges and can offer seasoned perspectives on problem-solving and strategic planning.
2. Stability & Reliability: According to research by the National Council on Aging, older workers have lower turnover rates and higher job satisfaction compared to younger employees. This stability can save companies the costs associated with high turnover and frequent retraining.
3. Mentorship & Knowledge Transfer: Older employees are well-positioned to mentor younger staff, fostering an environment of learning and development. This transfer of knowledge is invaluable for maintaining institutional memory and ensuring continuity.
4. Enhanced Soft Skills: Years of professional and personal experiences often translate into stronger interpersonal and communication skills. Older workers typically excel in areas requiring diplomacy, negotiation, and customer service.
5. Work Ethic & Professionalism: Studies have shown that older employees often demonstrate a strong work ethic, dedication, and professionalism. These traits contribute positively to workplace culture and productivity.
So, what can employers do to help create an age-diverse workforce?
To combat age discrimination, hiring managers need to adopt a 'skills first' approach, prioritising the skills and competencies required for the job over age-related biases. Here are some practical steps to achieve this:
Creating an age-inclusive workforce is not just about compliance with legal requirements; it is a strategic advantage. Older workers offer invaluable experience and stability, which can significantly enhance business performance. By implementing the practices outlined above, employers can build a more inclusive, productive, and harmonious workplace that leverages the strengths of all employees, regardless of age.
Addressing age discrimination also requires a concerted effort from all levels of an organisation. By adopting a 'skills first' approach and implementing inclusive recruitment practices, hiring managers can not only combat ageism but also harness the full potential of a diverse workforce. As Avivah Wittenberg-Cox wisely noted, "It's time to see age as an asset and not a barrier."
CIPD: Understanding Older Workers
Life’s 4 Quarters by Avivah Wittenberg-Cox
Centre for Ageing Better: Tackling ageism in Recruitment
Centre for Ageing Better: Good Recruitment for Older Workers
Centre for Ageing Better: Closing the Employment Gap
Harvard Business Review: Bridging Generational Divides